|
中文摘要Q?/span>
|
【目的?/strong>构徏通过学术创新性而非学术影响力进行期刊评L(fng)新指标——期刊颠覆性指?Journal Disruption Index, JDI),q进行实证研I?
【方法?/strong>选择2016qWeb of Science中Virology学科34U期刊中Articlecd论文占比?0%且可在开攑ּ文数据库(the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations, COCI)中获取引文关pȝ22U期刊作为研I对象，分别计算每种期刊的JDI,比较Ҏ(gu)JDI和期?q篏U媄(jing)响因?Cumulative Impact Factor for 5 Years, CIF5)、期刊PR6指数(Journal Index for PR6,JIPR6)、期刊论文被引频ơ^均百分位(Average Percentile in Subject Area, aPSA)排序的差异。分析创新性指标与不同影响力指标之间的相关度?
【结果?/strong>Z创新性指标和影响力指标的期刊排序l果存在较大差异Q?2U?54.5%)期刊JDI排名高(sh)影响力指标排名；17U?77.0%)期刊两类指标排名差≥5。JDI与CIF5、JIPR6、aPSA都呈中度相关Q相兛_分别?.486?.471?0.448。论文的l对颠覆指数D_Z与论文篏计被引频?Accumulated Citations, AC)、论?U百分位数排?Percentile Ranking with 6 Classifications, PR6)、论文被引频ơ学U领域百分位(Percentile in Subject Area, PSA)亦呈中度相关Q相兛_分别?.593?.575?0.593?
【结论?/strong>JDI应用于科技期刊评h(hun)能更好地体现期刊载文的学术质量和原创性，较ؓ(f)客观C现科技期刊的学术水qI有助于推动学术研I、科技期刊、学术评价体p良性发展?
|
|
英文摘要Q?/span>
|
[Purposes] This paper aims to construct a new index for journal evaluation through academic innovation rather that academic influence Journal Disruption Index (JDI), and conduct empirical research.
[Methods] We selected 22 journals with?0% Article, whose citation relationship could be obtained in the Open Citations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI) , among 34 journals of Virology in Web of Science in 2016 as the research objects. JDI of each journal was calculated separately, and the differences between JDI and journal Cumulative impact Factor for 5 Years (CIF5), Journal Index for PR(JIPR6), and Average Percentile in Subject Area (aPSA) were analyzed.
[Findings] There are big differences in the ranking results of journals based on innovation index and influence index. There are 12 (54.5%) journals whose JDI ranking is higher that the ranking of impact indicators, and 17 (77.0% ) journals whose ranking difference between the two categories of indicators is ?5. JDI is moderately correlated with CIF5, JIPR6, and aPSA, and the correlation degrees are 0.486, 0.471, and -0.448, respectively. Dz of the article is also moderately correlated with Accumulated Citations (AC), Percentile Ranking with 6 Classifications (PR6) and Percentile in Subject Area (PSA), with the correlation degrees of 0.593, 0.575, and -0.593, respectively.
[Conclusions] The application of JDI in the evaluation of scientific journals can better reflect the academic quality and originality of journals, objectively reflect the academic level of scientific journals, and help promote the sound development of academic research, scientific journals and academic evaluation system.
|